However, a contrasting approach from another jurisdiction will illuminate more clearly some striking features of the English and Welsh paradigm and, for this reason, we will consider certain aspects of the Spanish context as a useful counterpoint. There have been anumber of high profile cases of ethically contaminated food in Britain, and we shall, therefore, explore the problem in this context. This article not only explores a specific question which has not hitherto been addressed, it also confronts the much wider implications of the problem for tort and human rights law. The interests identified as being infringed, and the weight which the juridical system attaches to them, are crucial determiners of the remedies available to individual litigants. What private legal redress is available in England and Wales for individuals who discover that a third party has deliberately contaminated their food with a substance which is physically harmless but repugnant to their beliefs? The answer to this question is by no means straightforward, but the conundrum goes to the heart of the values embedded within the legal framework: in essence, what are the fundamental interests which tort law seeks to protect? As Baez demonstrates, these interests are not static, given that all living legal systems are constantly evolving, but are nevertheless a key element of any sophisticated assessment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |